🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a large but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense controversy over their future often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are kept stated it would consider to put them down unless the government covers the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and social skills suggest they are remarkably smart animals – something a former trainer observed directly.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that entailed gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She formed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing temperaments.

“One whale chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a context of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, died. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility links to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but previously claimed: “The whales … obtain far higher quality health care and 24/7 attention than any individual in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in early March following the demise of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility suspected details of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was fired soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to put down even a one beluga would require “significant manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She backs demands for the whales to be removed immediately from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing situation in confinement and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience authorize an export that would prolong the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reveal a wider incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As officials work to find a answer, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for Inuit communities.

A planned sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been highly debated. The future site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain positive that it could in time represent a permanent answer for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.

The project lead, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will mimic the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|